Get your Luxembourg employer to fund your bootcamp
The State refunds your company 15% of what it invests in training each year. Invoices from external training providers and e-learning are written into the list of eligible costs, and no Luxembourg accreditation of the school is required. Here is the sentence to put in front of your manager, and the INFPC mechanics your HR team needs.
What the cofinancement de la formation en entreprise actually is
Luxembourg has no personal training voucher like the French CPF or the German Bildungsgutschein. What it has instead is one of the most usable employer schemes in Europe: a private-sector company legally established and mainly active in Luxembourg gets back 15% of what it invested in training over its financial year, and the rate climbs by 20 percentage points, to 35%, on the salary costs of participants aged 45 and over and of participants with no recognised diploma and less than ten years in the company. The eligible costs are set out explicitly and they include 'le coût des fournisseurs-formateurs et des organismes de formation externes' as well as e-learning. Nothing in the texts asks the training provider to hold a Luxembourg approval, and nothing asks it to be established here: the establishment condition falls on the company that claims. Code Labs Academy can therefore invoice a Luxembourg employer today, and that invoice counts toward the claim. Read the rest of this page with one fact in mind, because it decides how you use it: the money reaches the employer, never the learner. This is not a student grant, and there is no form for you to file. It is a 15% argument to put in front of whoever owns the training budget, plus the mechanics HR needs to make it work: the course belongs inside the company's plan de formation, e-learning attendance has to be evidenced, and the claim is filed once a year with INFPC within five months of the financial year end, which means 31 May for a company on the calendar year.
The claim belongs to your employer, not to you. Any private-sector company legally established and mainly active in Luxembourg can apply for the aid on its own annual training investment, and there is no equivalent form for an employee to file.
Nothing is required of the school. The eligible costs explicitly include the cost of external training providers and organisations ('le coût des fournisseurs-formateurs et des organismes de formation externes') and e-learning, and the texts set no accreditation condition and no country condition on the provider.
Any employee the company sends can be counted. The aid is computed on the company's whole annual training investment, so the real question is whether your employer files a claim, not whether you personally pass a test.
Two participant profiles are worth more. The rate rises by 20 percentage points, to 35%, on the salary costs of participants aged 45 and over and of participants who hold no recognised diploma and have less than ten years in the company.
The establishment condition sits on the company, not on you. The texts attach no residence requirement to the participant, so if you commute in from France, Belgium or Germany to a Luxembourg employer, you are on the same footing as a resident colleague.
The course should sit inside the plan de formation. INFPC expects the training to be part of the company's training plan for the year: a formality in most companies, but one worth arranging before you enrol rather than after.
Frequently asked questions
Does any of this money reach me?
No, and any page that suggests otherwise is misreading the scheme. The beneficiary is the company: it invests in training, it files the annual application, and the State refunds 15% of that investment to the company, where it is taxable income. Nothing is paid to the participant and there is no application an employee can submit. What you gain is a cheaper yes: the course costs your employer 15% less than the figure on our quote, which is often exactly the margin a hesitant budget holder needs. Worth adding to the conversation: in Luxembourg, job-related training paid for by the employer is not treated as a taxable benefit in kind for the employee, so the sponsorship does not come back to you as extra tax on your payslip. Your payroll department can confirm that for your specific case.
Does an online course from a German provider really count?
Yes. The list of eligible costs names the cost of external training providers and training organisations, and separately names e-learning, and nowhere do the texts require the provider to hold a Luxembourg approval or to be established in Luxembourg. The only establishment requirement falls on the company that claims: it has to be legally established and mainly active in Luxembourg. Code Labs Academy is a German company and is certified AZAV in Germany. That certification is not required here and buys nothing legally in Luxembourg, but HR teams sometimes like to see a recognised quality approval in the file. One practical condition does apply to distance learning: participation has to be evidenced, and INFPC asks for logfile or attendance evidence. Our classes are live with an instructor at fixed times, we record attendance for every session, and we hand the logs and a certificate of completion to your employer for the file.
What if the application is refused, or my employer will not file it?
INFPC reviews the file and the Ministry of Labour decides, application by application, so approval is never automatic and no company should book the 15% as certain before the decision arrives. The good news is that the course does not depend on it: the refund is a rebate on a purchase your employer has already decided to make, not the funding that makes it possible. If a claim is refused, ask INFPC what in the file caused it, since the usual causes are documentary (missing attendance evidence, training that was never in the plan de formation, costs recorded in the wrong financial year) and are fixable for the next cycle. If your employer simply will not fund the course, our guide to employer-funded training has the wider business case, and if you pay yourself we offer interest-free monthly instalments of up to 60 payments directly to Code Labs Academy and a discount for paying upfront.
We have missed 31 May. Can we still claim for last year?
No. The application is filed once a year, within five months of the end of the company's financial year, and the deadline is strict with no extension. For a company on the calendar year that means 31 May, and a financial year filed after it can no longer be claimed. The practical consequence for you is about timing rather than paperwork: if the company's window for the past year has closed, the course should be invoiced and paid inside the current financial year so that it lands in the next annual file. Companies with a financial year that does not follow the calendar count their own five months from their own closing date, so ask finance for the exact date rather than assuming 31 May.
Our company has never claimed this. Is it worth the paperwork?
It is one application per year covering all of the company's training activity, not a form per course, which is why the effort is fixed while the refund grows with the training budget. Two things decide whether it is worth it for your employer: the size of the annual training investment, and where that investment sits against the ceiling, which is 20% of payroll for 1 to 9 employees, 3% for 10 to 249, and 2% for 250 and above. Small companies are often surprised here, because the 20% ceiling is generous enough that a single bootcamp is fully inside it. Remember also that the refund is taxable for the company, so present it to finance as a net figure rather than a gross one. We make the input side easy: a costed programme, an invoice with the hours on it, attendance logs and a completion certificate, which is most of what the file needs from an external provider.
Can I also take individual training leave for the same course?
Be careful with this combination and raise it before anything is filed. The congé individuel de formation, Luxembourg's paid training leave, excludes training that is co-financed under other legal provisions, so if your employer claims the cofinancement on the same course, a leave application for it can be refused. The two instruments also do different jobs: the cofinancement reduces what your employer pays for the fee, while training leave compensates salary for days spent studying and pays nothing toward tuition. Decide with your employer which one matters more for your situation instead of assuming you can stack both, and let the Service de la formation professionnelle rule on any leave application, since it assesses each file individually.
Get personalised advice
Not sure what you’re eligible for in Luxembourg? Book a one-to-one call with our education specialists. We can explain how our payment plans and discounts work, and point you towards common Luxembourg routes such as training leave, employer sponsorship, in-company training co-funding, or ADEM support for registered jobseekers (where eligible). You’ll leave the call with a clear plan and the right questions to ask before you commit.
